Matthew Confirms 9/11 Deceipt 01.01.2002   Search

Insights to 9/11


Matthew confirms deceipt in the 9/11 event.


Suzanne Ward, whose son Matthew died at 17 in 1980, began receiving clear communications from his immortal soul starting in 1994.

The Matthew books document that series of communications.

In the second book of the series, Revelations for a New Era, Ward includes in the revised 2002 edition a hand-inserted paper detailing some material that was left out of the first edition. It is significant. The subject was the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center.

Suzanne asks Matthew: I have read quite a few reports that blast the official conclusions, so some people definitely are not accepting all of this as it's being publicly presented. Can you tell me without any wavering at allthat the towers would NOT have collapsed if there hadn't been explosives set off?

Matthew replies: Without an iota of wavering, Mother!

The 5th World Journal covered this issue previously. The principle thrust of the matter is this: Burning jet fuel is not hot enough to weaken steel, allowing the towers to collapse. Here is an important excerpt from that coverage:

"The implications of the discovery of unspent aluminothermic explosives and matching residues in World Trade Center dust are staggering. There is no conceivable reason for there to have been tons of high explosives in the Towers except to demolish them, and demolition is blatantly incompatible with the official 9/11 narrative that the skyscrapers collapsed as a result of the jetliner impacts and fires. The discovery of active thermitic materials adds to a vast body of evidence that the total destruction of the Towers were controlled demolitions, and to the subset of that evidence indicating the use of aluminothermic materials to implement those demolitions. That discovery also undermines the oft-heard claim that no explosives residues were found, a claim that was never compelling, given the apparent lack of evidence that any official agency looked for evidence of explosive residues of any kind. Worse, the public record shows that NIST not only failed to look for such evidence, it repeatedly evaded requests by scientists and researchers to examine numerous facts indicating explosives and incendiaries."


5th WorldReturn to 5W
KnowledgeMore New History
5WJ logo Free Sign Up